PILLAR RANKING • May 3, 2026
public
Best Access: State Rankings
Ranked by facilities per 10,000 seniors — infrastructure density for the 65+ population.
Top 3 States
Browse Other Pillars
All 51 States Ranked
Higher score = better| Rank | State | Grade | Score | Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | North Dakota | A | 66.2 | 6.3 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #2 | Kansas | A | 53.8 | 6.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #3 | South Dakota | A | 52.4 | 6.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #4 | Iowa | A | 52.2 | 7.0 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #5 | New York | A | 51.8 | 1.8 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #6 | Minnesota | A | 50.3 | 3.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #7 | District of Columbia | A | 49.8 | 1.8 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #8 | Nebraska | A | 49.3 | 5.6 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #9 | Missouri | A | 46.0 | 4.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #10 | Massachusetts | B | 41.7 | 2.9 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #11 | Indiana | B | 37.5 | 4.6 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #12 | Ohio | B | 37.5 | 4.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #13 | Pennsylvania | B | 37.3 | 2.7 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #14 | California | C | 34.7 | 1.8 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #15 | Wisconsin | C | 34.0 | 3.1 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #16 | Rhode Island | C | 33.1 | 3.7 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #17 | Louisiana | C | 32.1 | 3.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #18 | Illinois | C | 31.8 | 3.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #19 | Mississippi | C | 31.5 | 4.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #20 | Texas | C | 30.8 | 2.8 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #21 | Connecticut | C | 30.7 | 2.9 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #22 | Oklahoma | C | 29.8 | 4.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #23 | Arkansas | C | 27.2 | 3.9 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #24 | West Virginia | C | 26.6 | 3.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #25 | Kentucky | C | 26.4 | 3.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #26 | New Jersey | C | 26.1 | 2.3 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #27 | Alaska | C | 25.0 | 2.0 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #28 | Maine | C | 24.4 | 2.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #29 | Vermont | C | 24.2 | 2.6 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #30 | Delaware | C | 24.1 | 2.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #31 | Utah | C | 23.3 | 2.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #32 | Wyoming | C | 22.2 | 3.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #33 | New Mexico | C | 21.8 | 1.7 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #34 | New Hampshire | D | 21.0 | 2.7 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #35 | North Carolina | D | 20.8 | 2.3 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #36 | Michigan | D | 20.4 | 2.3 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #37 | Washington | D | 20.3 | 1.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #38 | Colorado | D | 19.7 | 2.3 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #39 | Montana | D | 19.1 | 2.8 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #40 | Idaho | D | 19.0 | 2.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #41 | Virginia | D | 17.9 | 2.0 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #42 | Tennessee | D | 16.8 | 2.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #43 | Alabama | D | 16.2 | 2.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #44 | Georgia | D | 15.5 | 2.1 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #45 | Maryland | D | 14.9 | 2.1 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #46 | Oregon | F | 14.0 | 1.6 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #47 | South Carolina | F | 13.8 | 1.9 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #48 | Arizona | F | 10.1 | 1.1 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #49 | Nevada | F | 6.7 | 1.2 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #50 | Hawaii | F | 5.5 | 1.5 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
| #51 | Florida | F | 4.5 | 1.4 facilities per 10k seniors | View → |
Scores are 0–100 relative to other states. Pillar grades are assigned by within-pillar rank position. Read methodology →